Search:

Type: Posts; User: r3llik

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    That was my theory too dred. According to my...

    That was my theory too dred. According to my friend, her and some other higher powered players that did the attack, all attackes we're made in less than 30 mins. So I would assume it's about a minute...
  2. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    Did you read what was typed earlier. That's why...

    Did you read what was typed earlier. That's why we are trying to see the previous waves coz' it might have an effect on this outcome. How can we explain something without giving us all the details of...
  3. Thread: Fangtooth

    by r3llik
    Replies
    5
    Views
    1,407

    1. FTs are strong against any melee troops except...

    1. FTs are strong against any melee troops except GOs.
    2. FTs weakness are FMs, LJs, GOs. Speed troops are weak against them(FTs deals 1600 melee damage, go figure).
    3. Any great dragon will do....
  4. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    As I was saying before, I've seen a few reports...

    As I was saying before, I've seen a few reports that led me to my conclusion earlier. But it's all up to you to believe if my conclusion is right or not.
  5. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e105/znicrj/SKIL...

    http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e105/znicrj/SKILLET.png


    That's the first wave. They sent about 500k SSDs and 700k BDs for the first 10 waves(She lost just some SSDs troops there). Then they...
  6. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    There are about 16 reports. lol I would gladly...

    There are about 16 reports. lol I would gladly show her starting troops before the 16 waves of attack I you would like.
  7. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    Multiple waves of troops were sent doing minimal...

    Multiple waves of troops were sent doing minimal damage. Read battle mechanics damage distribution. This will clear most stuff up.
  8. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    I would want to post all the reports I got but I...

    I would want to post all the reports I got but I can't do that without my friends and the thread starter consent. It's not my battle so I can't post yet. And daniel, I'm sorry if took your question...
  9. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    Wow, another closed-minded guy. I have a friend...

    Wow, another closed-minded guy. I have a friend in that realm and saw all the reports from this battle. They sent in 5-8 wave of dragons and 4-6 waves of elites. So yeah, I've studied and seen all...
  10. Replies
    186
    Views
    21,340

    Oh, please. I'm pretty sure that's not all the...

    Oh, please. I'm pretty sure that's not all the report that you got. They probably sent in troops in many waves to kill all your troops. This is probably what happened:

    1. They sent in waves of...
  11. Replies
    24
    Views
    2,638

    Noted. I'm gonna start to run some tests now.

    Noted. I'm gonna start to run some tests now.
  12. Replies
    966
    Views
    144,093

    Attacker won. BD and about 4-5k GOs lost.

    Attacker won. BD and about 4-5k GOs lost.
  13. Replies
    24
    Views
    2,638

    Can you post one here please. Thanks.

    Can you post one here please. Thanks.
  14. Replies
    24
    Views
    2,638

    Yes, with WC at lvl 10 Field Range is still 2900,...

    Yes, with WC at lvl 10 Field Range is still 2900, so SSDs CAN'T still hit them at round one. LJs move 800, SSDs move 2000. There is STILL 100 units difference before they collide in melee combat.
  15. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,049

    Attacker still should have won with those...

    Attacker still should have won with those researches. Since FTs are at the back dealing a lot of ranged damage and the BDs tanking damage, they SHOULD have killed everything but tons of BDs loses...
  16. Replies
    24
    Views
    2,638

    Flaw #1: Attacking LJs deals about 160m initial...

    Flaw #1: Attacking LJs deals about 160m initial damage that would kill all defending LJs.

    Flaw #2: Battle Field Range = 2900(LJ range w/ wep cal lvl10(2400) + (500))
    LJs move 800...
  17. Replies
    51
    Views
    10,643

    Wow, that's just insane. Why even make fluff...

    Wow, that's just insane. Why even make fluff troops using rubies if you can train elites. Sigh
  18. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,049

    Research levels will greatly impact the outcome...

    Research levels will greatly impact the outcome of this battle. Your dragonry and rapid deployment are not maxed, that's what killed you(reason of daniel falls under here). If you could give me your...
  19. Replies
    51
    Views
    10,643

    I don't know what realm is that but that's...

    I don't know what realm is that but that's awfully a lot of fluff to make. Even that much fluff can take months to build.
  20. Replies
    966
    Views
    144,093

    So my calculation is close. Told you about 5k but...

    So my calculation is close. Told you about 5k but more if LBM doesn't die early. Just surprised that the attacker killed the LBMs last.
  21. Replies
    51
    Views
    10,643

    LOL Did he really thought that he can defeat the...

    LOL Did he really thought that he can defeat the troops that you sent. Just can't stop laughing.
  22. Replies
    966
    Views
    144,093

    Without doing any of the math. Battle starts...

    Without doing any of the math.

    Battle starts
    Rd1
    ATT: FTs and LJs moves forward. LJs kills about 20k BDs.
    DEF: All moves forward. Nothing in range(even all research at lvl 10)
    Rd2
    ATT: All...
  23. Replies
    24
    Views
    2,638

    lol, you gotta be joking right. First off,...

    lol, you gotta be joking right. First off, attacker takes priority of first attack. Attacker LJs got 160m attacking damage(not to include buffs and 5star general). Just by looking at enemy troops,...
  24. Replies
    11
    Views
    1,441

    Reason is because we've seen countless of reports...

    Reason is because we've seen countless of reports with the same results. That's where we came up of which troops prioritize which. Well at least that's how I do it.
  25. Replies
    966
    Views
    144,093

    I would say attacker won. Maybe around 5k FTs...

    I would say attacker won. Maybe around 5k FTs loses for the attacker. Attacker may lose more FTs if LJs attack the LBM last.
Results 1 to 25 of 171
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4
   Top